Search for: "Defendant Doe 1" Results 781 - 800 of 46,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
Here, the presumption does not apply to defendant's sister who lived in the same house with him. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:58 am
Defendant JBX responded to the discovery requests by objecting to their timeliness. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
In this recent New Jersey criminal appeal, the Appellate Division reversed the defendant's conviction on other grounds, but declined to rule that the trial judge's refusal to supply the jury with written instructions deprived the defendant of a fair trial. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 6:48 am
That the results of the USPO's duties may have dual uses (i.e. forming the basis for a revocation of supervised release and the initiation of new criminal charges) does not run afoul of the separation of powers. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:14 pm
Also, the defendant does not have to know that officers are in pursuit for it to be hot pursuit. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
September 13, 2011): The Court holds that (1) stale information (one year old) that Defendant dealt drugs on a handful of occasions, combined with (2) an expert opinion that drug dealers typically keep drugs in their homes, is not enough to establish probable cause to search the Apartment. . . . [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
The Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals held (2-1) that the trial court had committed reversible error. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by Andrew Frisch
 Denying the defendant’s motion, the court explained that OJ’s do not shift attorney’s fees in FLSA cases, because: (1) OJ’s only shift fees where a plaintiff prevails at trial, but for less than the amount of the OJ; and (2) the FLSA does not permit fee shifting to a defendant. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am by Travis Hinman
  The majority opinion does offer some safe harbor for class action defendants. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:12 am
Defendants argue that summary judgment should be affirmed because “a trespass to property, negligent or intentional, is a common law tort; it does not infringe the federal constitution. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Int’l posted on July 1, 2011, which is a North Carolina case involving similar parties and claims). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  June 1, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Domestic Relations Law  253 does not provide that a defendant must provide plaintiff with a GetIn Cohen v Cohen, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2112972, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States: neff-cert-petition.pdf us-waiver-letter.pdf Questions presented: 1. [read post]