Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 through 20"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 12:57 pm
In this case, the InterDigital complaint asserts the defendants are infringing U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
Quist, No. 1:11-cv-00831-GJQ (W.D. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
US, No. 06-11429 The term "felony drug offense" contained in the Controlled Substances Act's (CSA), 21 U.S.C. section 841(b)(1)(A), provision for a 20-year minimum sentence, is defined exclusively by section 802(44) and does not incorporate section 802(13)'s definition of "felony. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
How does the theory work? [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
Further, the court grants in part and denies in part the second motion by defendant, H for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)1 and 7. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm
” pp. 19 – 20. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:21 am
SCOV goes through each factor and explains generally how each can contribute to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Gallo, No. 065309 In claim for unconstitutional strip search in the absence of individualized suspicion that she was secreting contraband, grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants is vacated in part, affirmed in part, and remanded where: 1) defendant's evidence demonstrated a violation of her Fourth Amendment right; 2) defendant was subjected to a strip search by the police, pursuant to departmental policy, in the absence of individualized suspicion… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 12:29 am
The proposed tax would raise $20 million. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
Second Nature Landscaping & Construction, No. 20 16-CV-8925 (C.P. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
Aug. 20, 2002):[Third-party defendant] argues that the customer list is critical to the question of whether [third-party plaintiff] is the real party in interest in this case. . . . [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
Specifically, Pincelli argues: (1) there was not a meeting of the minds; and (2) the email(s) referenced by Plaintiff does not satisfy the statute of frauds. . . . [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:43 pm
§ 20-3-31 (1) and O.C.G.A. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 2:14 pm
Once a settlement is reached, there are several key steps that follow: 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 2:14 pm
Once a settlement is reached, there are several key steps that follow: 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 2:14 pm
Once a settlement is reached, there are several key steps that follow: 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:58 pm
” Id. at *7 (citations removed, text omitted).[2] [The district court] does not state a claim construction of “a filler,” let alone justify a particular construction by addressing the parties’ respective contentions about the term’s meaning through the usual analysis. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
Accordingly, both parties respectfully request in the absence of a sealing of the entire Court record, that Plaintiff's name be replaced with "John Doe" and that the parties be permitted to re-file the exhibits identified by ECF numbers 1-3, 1-6, 1-7, 5-1, 7-1, 7-2, 7-3, 7-4, 7-6, 9-1, and 13, which currently contain personally identifying information…. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:28 pm
Estimator variables include: Distance and lighting: Recent studies cited by the Group indicate that even for a person with 20/20 vision, perception of faces begins to diminish at 25 feet and faces are unrecognizable at 134 feet. [read post]
