Search for: "Doe v. Department of Health & Human Services"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2020, 4:45 am
Data-mining operations have been conducted on large datasets to build predictive computer models to provide real-time information about health services, showing where demand is rising and where critical equipment needs to be deployed. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:45 am
Data-mining operations have been conducted on large datasets to build predictive computer models to provide real-time information about health services, showing where demand is rising and where critical equipment needs to be deployed. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:45 am
Data-mining operations have been conducted on large datasets to build predictive computer models to provide real-time information about health services, showing where demand is rising and where critical equipment needs to be deployed. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Department of Health and Human Services reports that 80,000 to 90,000 people were waiting for a kidney or liver transplant in each of the years 2006, 2007, and 2008, during which [he] conducted his liver4you.org scheme. . . . [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
One of the named parties, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell and her entourage of a few aides and security personnel passed through. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
These are human-developed systems. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm
How does the service work? [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Department of Health and Human Services, 14-1453; Zubik v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm
And because Xavier Becerra, in his capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, has not validly cured the Task Force's constitutional problems, the district court properly enjoined the defendants from enforcing the preventive-care mandates to the extent they came at the recommendation of the Task Force. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm
All states have regulations requiring health care providers to report cases of listeriosis and public health officials try to interview all persons with listeriosis promptly using a standard questionnaire about high-risk foods. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:49 am
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:24 am
A witness who has received training and holds a current certification as a Drug Recognition Expert, issued by the State Department of Health and Human Services, shall be qualified to give the testimony under this subdivision. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
His vast experience in cannabis science, politics, and public policy includes founding America's first hemp food business (Hungry Bear Hemp Foods), founding Oregon's first medical clinic/support/education center (Compassion Center) for medical cannabis patients, and serving on legislative and administrative advisory committees for the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program under the Department of Human Services and the Oregon Health Authority. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
So instead, let me say a little bit about one case the court has repeatedly rescheduled and that has garnered some attention: Doe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:21 pm
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) continues to dominate the field with Medicare, Medicaid, HITECH, and unique plan identifier rules impacting billions of dollars. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
In theory, the FTC could address both the 3rd and 11th Circuits’ concerns about vague cybersecurity standards by promulgating more prescriptive rules instead of relying on FTC common law, as the Department of Health and Human Services does under HIPAA. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
