Search for: "Doe v. United States of America"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2012, 7:34 am
It does not appear in any law of war treaty, and it has never been tried in a military commission in the United States or elsewhere. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
: The Role of Barnette in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:27 am
”); see also United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:23 pm
United States of America and the opinion can be found here. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:28 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.No. 09-6072UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT11a0293p.06; 2011 U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 8:42 am
The United States of America (‘US’), one of the treaty’s signatories, has adopted Article 1(A) of the Convention without any substantial reservation, understanding or declaration (‘RUDs’). [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
Third, she argued she should not have to reimburse Pinto for enforcing the Mexican custody order since she claimed her Mexican lawyer said she could take the children to the United States without violating that order. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:43 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s decision is Florida v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:17 am
Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 4:21 pm
In Felder v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
Affording Congress an Opportunity to Address Family SeparationBy the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., it is hereby ordered as follows:Section 1. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
” By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 2:34 am
In the first case, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:15 am
Two historical groups added “to the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
Section 1338(a) does not deprive the state courts of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
The government’s recommendation in Bank of America v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
