Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 781 - 800 of 2,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2022, 2:01 pm by Holly Brezee
Leave may also be carried over provided the entitlement does not exceed 64 hours per applicable year. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm by News Desk
“The median age of patients was 64 years (range = 9-87 years); 17 (59 percent) were female. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:52 pm by Greg Jordan
In response, the defendants argued that Five Star was only entitled to 3/8 of a 1/8 interest, or a 3/64 interest. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
  *1 Monica Mahmoodzadeh, the widow of Payam Mahmoodzadeh, filed a petition for year’s support in the Probate Court of Cobb County, seeking to set aside real property and funds in various money-market accounts. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:17 am
Co., 64 N.Y.2d 846, 848, 476 N.E.2d 640, 641, 487 N.Y.S.2d 314, 315 (1985) 2 Seaboard Surety Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:28 am
  Questions Presented (1) In order to bring a class action under the UCL, as amended by Proposition 64, must every member of a proposed class action have suffered “injury in fact,” or is it sufficient that only the class representative comply with that requirement? [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
Board of Education 10 years earlier, in 1964 only 1% of white and black kids attended schools together in the South. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 5:33 am by Cannabis Law Group
When Proposition 64 went into effect Jan. 1, it brought with it new sets of rules in regards to recreational marijuana sales. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:08 am
The major age breakdown was 28.5% under 18, 24.8% from 25 to 44, and 29.2% from 45 to 64. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
His judgment concluded:"64. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:44 am by Robert Elliott, J.D.
(WCxKit)     O’Brien said the Act had clearly been unfair to workers over the age of 64, previously entitled to only one year of income payments. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It was already decided in J 19/90 [2.1.2 to 2.1.4] that merely paying the fee for appeal does not constitute a valid lodging of an appeal. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:31 pm
No. 2153, 64 C.L.R. (3d) 104, 157 A.C.W.S. (3d) 940 (Ont. [read post]