Search for: "Does 1 - 75" Results 781 - 800 of 4,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2008, 5:39 am
For instance, even though the bankruptcy code provides for lifting the automatic stay under Article 75, it does not explain the circumstances under which the bankruptcy judge should lift the stay. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:40 pm by WIMS
EPA mandated that States must meet a new 1-hour SO2 standard using a 99th percentile form, set at 75 ppb maximum SO2 concentration. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:19 am by Robert Chesney
(The relevant provisions are GCI art. 49; GCII, art. 50; GCIII arts. 84, 86, 99, 102–08; GCIV arts. 5, 64, 66–75, 117; common art. 3; API art. 75; APII art. 6; and ICCPR art. 14.) [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:18 pm
Our construction of Rule 75(A)(3) in this rare circumstance does no violence to the rule's language, nor can be it be said that the narrow rule we announce today defies the expectations of litigants. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:06 am by Mark Weidemaier
Curiously, the voting provisions of Schedule I, and especially the 75% voting threshold in par. 1(c), don’t require modifications to win the support of 75% of the “outstanding” debt. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:40 pm by Gene Takagi
§ 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status and 75 percent of them were Form 1023-EZ applications. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The reclamation plan calls for 25 percent (or approx. 225 acres) of mined areas to be reclaimed to agricultural land, and 75 percent (or around 674 acres) of the mined areas would become agricultural water ponds. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
"The jurisprudence is not free from difficulty or criticism, but it does not follow that better solutions are readily to hand. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 6:01 pm
Ill persons range in age from 2 to 57 years; however, more than 70% are less than 19 years old and none are over 60 years old; 75% are female. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:50 am
Sawyer sued Onondaga County, contending that the county had retaliated against them for “whistle blowing” in violation of (1) their Constitutional right to free speech and (2) Section 75-b of the Civil Service Law. [read post]