Search for: "Does 1-1000"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 6:51 am
It is grossly misleading to suggest that the current, complex legal regime at the federal, state, and local levels does not exist. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
As read properly, § 16-5-90 does not violate the First Amendment — but also does not cover Matthew Chan’s speech. 3. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
Although the number of cases before the Court (21), the range of situations being referred to the Court (8), and the number of requests for the Court to get involved in conflicted areas around the world (1000s) have reached unprecedented levels, support for the Court is waning in some circles. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
It does not follow that the probability that the result was due to chance is only .25 since, in my simple example, that would mean a .75 chance that the coin is double headed. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
The law does not define what constitutes an interview and does not address what happens if no interview is required for the position. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:09 am
Oleson’s article on data-driven sentencing. 1. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
While the “ban the box” law does not offer aggrieved job applicants a private right of action, employers who violate the new law shall be subject to a fine of $1000 for a first violation, $5000 for a second violation and $10,000 for every subsequent violation. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
The law does not define what constitutes an interview and does not address what happens if no interview is required for the position. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
Lessons From Michael Phillips’ Wrongful Conviction 1. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:43 pm
For many months, if not more, that number stands at 1000 lawyers. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:39 pm
Perhaps one syndicator in 100 – or maybe one in 1000 – decided to take over the capital raising function by forming a captive brokerage firm. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
In earlier posts I have dealt with general concerns about the Defamation Act 2013 and concerns about section 1, “Serious harm”. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
A fine in a misdemeanor case can be $1000 or more. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 3:41 pm
Since we started our Tor Challenge two weeks ago we have signed up over 1000 new Tor relays. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
SEIU, Local 1000, 132 S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
I therefore conclude that Ali does not support the appellant’s case. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:51 pm
Violating the law would result in a fine of $500 for a first offense or $1000 after that. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Ceballos): That Lane testified about his official activities pursuant to a subpoena and in the litigation context, in and of itself, does not bring Lane’s speech within the protection of the First Amendment.. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
S. 1, 8 (1988); Blum v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:50 am
Does ownership make sense? [read post]
