Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 781 - 800 of 11,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act does not go into effect until April 1, 2018; at which time Massachusetts employers will be required to provide written notice to employees of their rights under the Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:28 am by Rose Hughes
However, the EPO applies the same gold standard to disclaimers as it does to any other type of feature. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland – 5th Circuit Court of Appeal (9-27-21) Kahumbu v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
” Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang, happily married for 27 years! [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 4:09 am by Amber Kardamilakis
In August 2024, the High Court found that a shareholder does not have the authority to institute legal proceedings on behalf of the company it is a shareholder of without (1) a resolution from the underlying company’s board of directors or (2) express authority in the underlying company’s memorandum of incorporation (MOI). [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
It does so by reference to cases decided in the 2 years since Guest was decided. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:03 pm
Pursuing the matter on an individual basis is neither cost-effective nor does it garner the same attention from your ex-employer as a $600-million lawsuit on behalf of 10,000 employees would, such as the suit the CIBC currently faces for unpaid overtime. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
FDA states that trading partners should make a determination (presumably after November 27, 2018) based on whether: (1) At least one of the transaction information documents (the transaction history) for the product describes an initial transaction date from the manufacturer as one that occurs between November 27, 2017 and November 26, 2018; or (2) there is other documentary evidence created by a trading partner “in the ordinary course of business” that… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:08 am by Hayleigh Bosher
”However, the complaint does states that the “Defendants, have knowingly, willfully, and intentionally engaged in a campaign to infringe Plaintiff’s copyright in the work “All I Want for Christmas is You,” and points to violation of Section 106 (1)-(3) and (5) of 17 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am by Guido Paola
Moreover, although it was accepted that claim 1 of the main request did not cover the third embodiment depicted in figure 5, there was still a general basis in the section "SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION" on pages 2 to 5.More particularly, the features of the housing and the display member in threaded engagement with each other were based on page 6, line 32, to page 7, line 3, in connection with the first embodiment of the invention and, implicitly, on page 2, lines 17 to 27,… [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am by Guido Paola
Moreover, although it was accepted that claim 1 of the main request did not cover the third embodiment depicted in figure 5, there was still a general basis in the section "SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION" on pages 2 to 5.More particularly, the features of the housing and the display member in threaded engagement with each other were based on page 6, line 32, to page 7, line 3, in connection with the first embodiment of the invention and, implicitly, on page 2, lines 17 to 27,… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Milligan is the most important shadow docket entry since John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
  Also posted on HIPAA, HITECH & HIT HIPAA does not protect animals’ health information – it applies to the protected health information (or PHI) of an “individual”, defined as “the person who is the subject of” the PHI. [read post]