Search for: "Early v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 18,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2019, 10:47 pm
As there was no provision in the TCSA to address early termination of the agreement, Gordon J. applied the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Howard v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
(By contrast, for a glimmer of the nature of the beast, you can just read the sentences I've underlined):"Francisco Castaneda was imprisoned by the State of California following a December 6, 2005 criminal conviction and held in the custody of the California Department of Corrections (DOC) until his early release date, March 26, 2006. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:11 pm
It concerns, according to Judge Gould, a class action brought by a couple of teachers who ask for a "return [of] interest that was allegedly skimmed from their state-managed retirement accounts. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:16 am
In the case of Schade v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 2:45 pm
In ordering the defendant detained, the trial court gave great weight to the fact that the defendant was charged with a violent first degree offense that was subject to the State’s No-Early-Release Act, that the defendant had dual citizenship, and that release was not recommended by pretrial services. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
For a thorough discussion of the early procedural history and some of the novel issues the case raised, see Stephen Vladeck’s excellent 2010 ACS issue brief. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
The policy justifications for early trade secrets identification were summarized succinctly in a discovery order in North American Lubricants Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:52 pm
Enter Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In 2010, Judge Brookman received the Director’s Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder, in Washington, DC, for superior performance as an Assistant United States Attorney, for his work on the United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:39 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:58 am
It is now expected to be released early next week. [read post]
23 May 2018, 1:04 pm
It is not too early to consider what the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Nguyen v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am
Google YouTube Isn’t a State Actor (DUH)–PragerU v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
CUS Nashville Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:28 pm
Indiana v. [read post]
