Search for: "Elsevier"
Results 781 - 800
of 961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 4:28 am
EcontentMag – “Elsevier, a publisher of scientific, technical and medical information products and services, announced the ‘Article of the Future' project, an ongoing collaboration with the scientific community to redefine how a scientific article is presented online. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 7:42 am
The giant publisher Reed Elsevier (in whose capacious bosom LexisNexis rests) is experimenting with the form that a published scientific article takes online. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Thomson Reuters/West Breakingviews.com in Sale Talks with Thomson Reuters Westlaw Launches New Programs Focused on Pro Bono and Lawyers in Transition Westlaw Do Justice Between Cases IndLaw.com Acquired by Thomson Reuters Reed Elsevier/LexisNexis LexisNexis Warns 13,000 of Possible Data Breach Class Says LexisNexis Botches Reports LexisNexis Chief Says Company isn’t Going Anywhere Reader’s Respond to this story: LexisNexis isn’t Leaving… [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:32 pm
” Well, that’s what Elsevier’s marketing department says, anyway. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:39 am
Publisher: Amsterdam ; Boston : Elsevier, c2008- Description: v. ; 24 cm. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 7:16 am
Elsevier will soon be known as the Bush Administration of academic publishers! [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:14 am
Reed Elsevier Satori Group Announces Expanded Partnership with LexisNexis Thomson West Update to the “pocket part” case: Law Professors Clear Hurdle in Suit Against West Publishing New edition of Fundamentals of Legal Research available Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th coming in July Thomson Reuters Site to Track Bailout Money Other CCH issues new White Paper: The Obama Administration’s Proposal to Reform the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:29 am
In March, the Supreme Court accepted certiorari in Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:29 am
In March, the Supreme Court accepted certiorari in Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:37 pm
Readers may be interested in a case currently pending before the Supreme Court called Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
Yesterday the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic filed this brief on behalf of respondents Irving Muchnick et al. in No. 08-103, Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 9:00 am
Shatzer, Sr. (08-680) and Reed Elsevier, et al., v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:19 am
The revelations recently about Elsevier’s efforts to disguise marketing as scholarship clearly show that lists of preferred or ‘top’ journals, should likely be avoided altogether until the barriers to an unbiased rating system are removed. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:43 pm
...after this scandal. [read post]
17 May 2009, 7:00 pm
The petitioner’s merit brief is due Monday in Reed Elsevier, et al., v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 10:04 am
Concurring Opinions has an interesting post titled "Mercketing," which describes how Merck and Elsevier created their own "journal" in Australia. [read post]
15 May 2009, 10:24 pm
Progressive Librarians Guild Calls for Elsevier to End Corrupt Publishing Practices and for Library Associations to Take Advocacy Role on... [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:18 pm
One new method is creating its very own “journal”, as Merck and Elsevier did in Australia: From 2002 through 2005, the Australian affiliate of Merck paid the Australian office of Elsevier, an academic publisher, to publish eight compilations of scientific articles under the title Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine, a spokesman for Elsevier said. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:54 pm
Ben Goldacre of The Guardian reports today:A fascinating court case in Australia has been playing out around some people who... [read post]
8 May 2009, 6:42 am
Starting three weeks ago in The Australian, and this week twice in The Scientist (free registration required), it has been uncovered that Elsevier produced a number of publications that had the look and feel of peer-reviewed publications, but were in fact marketing tools: Elsevier is conducting an “internal review” of its publishing practices after allegations came to light that the company produced a pharmaceutical company-funded publication in the early 2000s… [read post]
