Search for: "Ernst v. Ernst" Results 781 - 800 of 875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2009, 3:01 pm
In more detail, the Medical Device Safety Act (S. 540/H.R. 1346) would address the Supreme Court's Riegel v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:07 am
The case was Ernst & Young, et al., v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
(in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-1042 Title:  Ernst & Young, et al. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
”  Creating liability under 10b5-2’s “trust or confidence” would expand the scope of the O’Hagan test and would overstep its rule making authority citing Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v Green, 430 U.S. 462 (1977); Ernst & Ernst v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:10 pm
Participation of the appointing authority in a disciplinary actionFaga v Board of Educ. of Harrison Cent. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:06 am
Biffa Waste Services Ltd and Another v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH and Another Court of Appeal “The principle which made an employer liable for the negligence of a subcontractor engaged to carry out extra-hazardous or dangerous operations was unsaisfactory and should be applied as narrowly as possible. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Peakman v Linbrooke Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1239 (13 November 2008) H v Tomlinson [2008] EWCA Civ 1258 (13 November 2008) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Allen Wilson Joinery Ltd v Privetgrange Construction Ltd [2008] EWHC 2802 (TCC) (17 November 2008) Fosse Motor Engineers Ltd & Ors v Conde Nast & National Magazine Distributors Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 2527 (TCC) (30 September 2008) Biffa… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:53 am
Biffa Waste Services Ltd and another v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH and others [2008] EWCA Civ 1238; [2008] WLR (D) 353 “The principle that a person who employed an independent contractor would be liable for the negligence of that independent contractor where the independent contractor was engaged to carry out extra-hazardous or dangerous operations was binding on the Court of Appeal but its application should be kept as narrow as possible. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 2:44 pm
High Court (Chancery Division) Leisure Pass Group Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2008] EWHC 2158 (Ch) (11 September 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Bovale Ltd v Secretary of State for the Communities & Local Government & Anor [2008] EWHC 2143 (Admin) (01 September 2008) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Coal Authority v Davidson & Anor [2008] EWHC 2180 (TCC) (09 September 2008) Mylcrist Builders Ltd v Buck [2008]… [read post]