Search for: "Eugene Volokh" Results 781 - 800 of 13,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) This is the litigation I mentioned when the judge allowed it to go forward earlier this year; the judge has now ruled on the merits that the fact that President Obama’s father wasn’t a U.S. citizen doesn’t keep President Obama from being a natural-born citizen: Anyone born in the U.S., with narrow exceptions (such as that for the children of diplomats) is a U.S. citizen from birth, and therefore a natural-born citizen. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Randal O’Toole (Cato@Liberty) reports on his experience. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:22 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Dier v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) George Will writes about the petition for certiorari in Winn v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The Center for Competitive Politics points to these two passages from Politico and The Hill, both of which report on Sen. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:08 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That seems to be the story of Naser Abdo, who has been in the news much more than the average private. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The case is People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I found this column quite interesting, even though I’m not religious and never dealt with this problem myself. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I just wanted to highlight Jim’s post below about the latest Michael Bellesiles controversy, and Bellesiles’ response, which forms the basis of the post’s title. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From Montana Code § 13-35-218, titled “Coercion or Undue Influence of Voters,” first enacted by referendum in 1913 and still in effect: A person who is a minister, preacher, priest, or other church officer or who is an officer of any corporation or organization, religious or otherwise, may not, other than by public speech or print, urge, persuade, or command any voter to vote or refrain from voting for or against any candidate, political party… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Walter Olson
Great interview with the prolific and influential UCLA law professor (and founder of the Volokh Conspiracy blog) in which he talks about the Bill of Rights, the “hostile environment” menace to free speech, why we should not necessarily expect judges to strike down bad laws, concealed carry and the gun control issue, and the nannyism potential in tort law (& welcome Erin Miller, SCOTUSBlog readers). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:20 am by Paul Caron
Eugene Volokh (UCLA) has announced the launch of a new faculty-edited law journal, the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:45 pm
Once again Eugene Volokh is on the job. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A bill just introduced in Florida:(1)? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A reader points to this story, and asks:Why does the student government [here, at the University of Florida –EV] have a $14 million budget? [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The Thomas More Society reports:Today, Thomas More Society attorneys confirmed that Marathon County library officials have agreed to rescind their decision to cancel a showing of the pro-life documentary “BloodMoney” by the Wausau “40 Days for Life” group in one of the library’s public meeting rooms. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Following up on my previous posts (links below); Washington Post (The Volokh Conspiracy): At the University of Oregon, No More Free Speech for Professors on Subjects Such as Race, Religion, Sexual Orientation, by Eugene Volokh (UCLA): Last week, the University of Oregon made clear to its faculty: If you say... [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:45 pm
On The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh asks readers to consider how a move toward internationalism could alter the content of American free speech protections in circumstances where international norms would subject expression such as Internet hate speech to more restriction... [read post]