Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 18,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
Anne Marie Lofaso Late last year, in Janus v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:08 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Janus v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:08 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Janus v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 2:07 pm
Colorado, along with Madden v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:58 am
In Vazeen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:03 am
In the case, Close v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:52 am
By default, the "American Rule" with respect to attorney's fees awards states that each part must pay for its own attorney's fees and costs unless otherwise provided by statute or contract. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 7:12 am
It is a 2013, United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals case styled, The City of College Station, Texas v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:43 pm
In Mossing v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 5:20 pm
Even though it was only about a $2,500 award of attorney's fees. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:03 am
” Batson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:51 pm
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion when it denied the part of the motion which requested attorney fees (Difone v Difone 87 D3d 971, Taormina v Taormina 131 AD3 696). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:44 pm
In Casamento v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
” In Pennsylvania, the Court of Common Pleas for Lycoming County has stated that a public adjuster on a contingent fee may not testify as an expert. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
The authority of local governments to impose fees and exactions is subject to federal and state constitutional principles requiring that such land use regulations and development conditions must substantially advance a legitimate state interest. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:22 am
In a recent decision of the 1st Appellate District of Illinois, Multimedia Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:19 am
Karass, State Controller, et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 12:10 pm
In Haley v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:58 am
See United States v. [read post]
