Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2017, 7:03 pm
The Sixth Circuit dove into that surprisingly complicated question this week in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
John Reed Stark One of the most interesting and arresting business stories of 2017 has been the astonishing proliferation of initial coin offerings (ICOs), as I discussed in a prior post (here). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
(Kathy Willens/AP) During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Christie v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:16 am
Yancey v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
What that change will be wasn’t clear after the Justices heard arguments in the case of Christie v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:11 pm
United States (1997) and New York v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:45 am
In a double-header that will attach the interest of many court watchers, the nine Justices will tackle a case nominally about football and sports gambling: Christie v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am
The first is Christie v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 7:21 pm
QUICK FOLLOW UP: COMIC-CON SIRIUS XM RULING: FLORIDA DOESN’T DO PERFORMANCE RIGHTS FOX WINS ON EMPIRE TRADEMARK SUIT (FOLLOW-UP) IMPERSONATIONS AND TRADEMARK: H&M AND WOOF-TANG CLAN COSBY ACCUSER’S DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST LAWYER MOVES FORWARD LOOT BOXES IN VIDEOGAMES ACCUSED OF GAMBLING GOOGLE V. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm
Bleyer v Google Inc and Google v Trkulja get a mention in relation to their differing interpretations of the reasoning in Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corp & Ors[2009]. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:16 am
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this post ran on August 14, as an introduction to the blog’s symposium on Christie v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
Even so, the Court went on, in obiter, to declare that the well-known test in R v Ghosh [1982] EWCA Crim 2 should no longer represent the law. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:17 am
V&S sales, a trend that is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
Procter & Gamble Co. (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 496, 502-503.) [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
How Scottish Borders Council (SBC) gambled with at least £2.4 million of taxpayers’ money, lost it, wrote it off, then mounted a concerted campaign to conceal hundreds of documents, emails and letters linked to the financially disastrous episode from public scrutiny.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYNOTE: The vast majority of this information has been assembled in the course of a two and a half year investigation which SBC has consistently tried to frustrate and hamper.From 2008 onwards Scottish… [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
The question was whether Mr Ivey had “cheated” within the meaning of section 42 of The Gambling Act 2005 (which creates a criminal offence of cheating). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am
On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 1093 This case considered whether an implied term not to cheat in a gambling contract is only breached where there is dishonesty. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
This appeal considered whether an implied term not to cheat in a gambling contract is only breached where there is dishonesty. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
How can one pay a person who does not violate the law, or who does not gamble with the institution’s assets, or does not risk the institution’s reputation? [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:49 am
But years later, Marshall made his thoughts clear about the treaty clause in an 1823 decision called American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
