Search for: "Good v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 45,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm by Ted Folkman
In some states, e.g., North Carolina, see Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:53 pm by essex county criminal lawyer
In State v O’Brien, the defendant attempted to circumvent the one and done rule by reopening his prior (20 yr old) marijuana related CD in the municipal court. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
   But, with the count at 8 to 2, we’ll let you check out Ramirez and Alton on your own and instead focus on the good stuff. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
  This question is likely still haunting Cisco following yesterday's US Supreme Court defeat in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems, Inc (2015).In a 6-2 vote (Justice Breyer was recused), the highest court in the United States overturned the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) that held that the Cisco could run the "good faith" defence against Commil's claims that Cisco directly infringed its patent for a method of… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am by jonathanturley
His concurrence did not seriously question the majority view that Roe was not based on a good law. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union prohibits EU states from granting aid that "distorts or threatens to distort competition [between Member States] by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods... [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
“The State has failed to show the District Court abused its discretion in finding no good cause to order the Rule 35 examinations. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Where, as here, evidentiary material is considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), and the motion has not been converted to one for summary judgment, the criterion is whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether he or she has stated one, and, unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not… [read post]