Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 781 - 800
of 7,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2020, 7:14 am
Section 230, as a federal law, also preempts the California state constitution. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:43 pm
A California State prison sentence of 16 months, or two or three years. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Desserts, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2024, 3:43 am
And States Marine (States Marine International, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
California is an at-will employment state, which means employees can be fired for any reason and with no warning. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:00 am
The landmark California Supreme Court case on the issue of existence of implied employment contract is Foley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
She contended that the California Supreme Court’s decision in Gentry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:53 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:07 pm
In Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 12:54 pm
That's true in California state court. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
But California is one of numerous states whose judiciaries’ subject matter jurisdiction does not depend on standing. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The good news is the plaintiff can now proceed with the case in state court, which is where she wanted to be in the first place. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
It knows, however, that the warrant was no good, and also doesn't want to have to prove that the place was illegal under state law, since it probably wasn't.So what does the LAPD do? [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:16 pm
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:56 am
In Chindarah v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
See Greenwood v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
California argued that it was not "regulating" employers but merely placing conditions on state money. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Baltimore, and Dred Scott v. [read post]