Search for: "Gould v. Gould"
Results 781 - 800
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2018, 11:39 am
Gould v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am
Telecom Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Arizona (Phoenix) for the win.US v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:22 am
” The Court of Appeals addressed the issue of an individual obtaining “tenure by estoppel” in the Sewanhaka case [Gould v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 81 NY2d 446]. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 3:29 am
In Gould v Board of Education, 81 NY2d 446, the New York State Court of Appeals held that a “tenured teacher has a protected property [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 1:09 pm
Gould & Lamb, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:32 pm
In today’s case (Pinch v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
Gould, dissented. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:43 pm
In Hodel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:25 pm
Gould and Richard A. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Weil V. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 3:40 am
Both the affidavits and the assertions are contradicted by the operating agreement (Gould v McBride, 36 AD2d 706, 706-707 [1st Dept 1971], affd 29 NY2d 768 [1971] ["Where, as here, the cause of action is based on documentary evidence, the authenticity of which is not disputed, a general denial, without more, will not suffice to raise an issue of fact"]; see also First Interstate Credit Alliance v Sokol, 179 AD2d 583, 584 [1st Dept 1992] [where there were "affidavits . . .… [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Packert Trustee Chair in Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, discussed how the Sackett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
White v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
As set out in Prop. 22 (Art.9.), the law can be amended by seven-eighths majority; a threshold that drew dismay from Professor William Gould IV: ‘“I’ve never seen anything like that. [read post]
