Search for: "Grant v. People" Results 781 - 800 of 16,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
The court granted rehearing en banc, but later vacated the order as improvidently granted over the dissents of five judges. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
 Judge VanDyke has a point here.The question is whether the Cal Expo fairgrounds in Sacramento are a public forum sufficient to allow people to distribute First Amendment literature therein. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
     In the end, AI reflects the principles of the people who build it, the people who use it, and the data upon which it is built. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am by Will Baude
But that power extends only to people who are dangerous. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
The Chancellor granted a faculty based on the revised proposals [72, 73]. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
So method number one, is what most people are familiar with, is just regular symbolic AI. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
No state constitution, state law, state governor, state election official, or court can alter or constrain that grant of power.That seems pretty powerful--unless one bothers to look up Leser v. [read post]