Search for: "Grant v. Royal" Results 781 - 800 of 1,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am by Ron Coleman
 Well, excuse me, but I respect trademark registrations too darned much to treat them as royal grants of franchise or monopoly over a term that a pliant Examining Attorney green lights through the sausage machine! [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Further, as noted in Royal Communications Consultants Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 1:13 pm by Giles Peaker
But I would expect it to be not very long after the Bill has Royal Assent. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 6:56 am by Robert Brammer
Courts and since no statutory exception applied, France’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was granted. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  Permission to appeal was granted by Sir Richard Buxton on 18 August 2010. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 12 April 2017 the Court of Appeal granted the defendant’s application for permission to appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
The defendant’s counterclaim was successful and she was granted an injunction to prevent the defamatory remarks being republished, in addition to general and aggravated damages. 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP summarised the decision. [read post]
AND ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-06-01041-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-31- 07, pet. denied Oct 2009)09-0632APRIL AND JOSHUA RAY VAN HOOSE v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
For the reasons I have given, the circumstances of this case do not justify granting an extended period of anonymity pursuant to the Venables jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 am by Richard Hunt
July 1, 2021) and Love v Royal Pacific Motel, 2021 WL 2711731 (N.D. [read post]