Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:53 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
When the Supreme Court refused to grant cert in Sorich v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Looking further forward, PrawfsBlawg has an analysis of the issues to be addressed in the Court's upcoming arguments in Sullivan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:12 am
Daus, Slip Copy, 2009 WL 3151809 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), decided by Southern District Judge Richard Sullivan. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
It was a bad trip, since Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
Florida, Docket No. 08-7412 and Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
Other cases this term that will settle longtime legal disputes include Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Sullivan, for appellants. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
The amendments take effect Jan. 1. 2010.Justices Frank Sullivan and Robert Rucker dissented in part from the amended guidelines because they believed they overrule Grant v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:28 pm
Under Brady v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Over a century ago, this Court emphasized the point:In ordinary cases the judge has a discretion to grant a new trial whenever, in his opinion, wrong and injustice have been done by the verdict; and it is upon this ground that courts have refused to interfere to revise the granting of new trials.Goss, 17 Tex. at 115. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 12:28 am
Callaway Golf v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
"Unsurprisingly the news organizations' amici brief focused solely on the dangers of prior restraints and their intersection with copyright injunctions: "indeed, prior restraints cut against the very wording and core of the First Amendment, unlike the much more indirect effect of the First Amendment on libel law"where prior restraints are almost never granted (New York Times Co. v Sullivan (1964)). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:40 am
In fact, a period of 13 months and 18 days had elapsed between the Supreme Court’s ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run July 19, 2009. [read post]
