Search for: "HAIR v. STATE"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm
Krehling was also told that during visitation the infant and toddler hit and pulled Respondent's hair. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:19 am
The second, EEOC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
” A short, older man with white hair slicked back and heavy muttonchops stood and began loudly yelling. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:22 am
For example, in State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
” (citing Weather Underground, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:49 pm
Additional Resources: Feliciano v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
[He] suffers from a rare genetic condition called ectodermal dysplasia, which causes cosmetic abnormalities in the hair, nails, sweat glands, and teeth. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm
(Specifically, this court notes the absence of any reference in the DIR to the bruises, redness, and swelling that allegedly resulted from the defendant pulling the complainant's hair.) [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51445(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
Curiously enough, while frustration causes legal writer tear their hair and fictional felines tear their fur, regular consumers don't seem to be so confused. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:17 am
– everything from hair sampling methods to bite mark analysis to arson investigation – was greatly unreliable. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:00 am
The employee worked at a hair salon. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am
Such relief is rarely granted under New York law, where, as in the case at bar, the movant would be receiving the ultimate relief pendente lite and could ultimately be compensated through monetary damages, Rosa Hair Stylists Inc. v Jaber Food Corp., 218 AD2d 793 (2d Dep’t 1995); see Matos v City of New York, 21 AD3d 936 (2d Dep’t 2005); Neos v Lacey, 291 AD2d 434 (2d Dep’t 2002). [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
STEFAN V. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
That may be splitting hairs, but that’s what lawyers often do—split hairs. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:04 pm
The article states that two men wearing masks entered a Shell gas station on Lincoln Street shortly after 3am this past Thursday. [read post]
