Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 781 - 800 of 16,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm by Josh Blackman
I hope not, because such a rule would be inappropriate. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:24 pm by Amy Howe
The justices sent the case, Arizona v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
But overall they're a hopeful story of state residents coming together to write something enduring. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
This could potentially represent a tiny window of hope: as long as Saied’s opponents retain this avenue for expression, they might succeed in preventing more damage from being done and in buying themselves time to build new pathways of resistance. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Welty
The Fourth Circuit considered the intersection of open carry and Terry in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:58 am by Eric Goldman
I hope this post makes clear why I get so irritated whenever I see the phrases referenced in a court opinion or invoked by a grandstanding politician. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” On her reading, the constitutionalism of care and equality that characterizes the end state after misogyny is insufficiently critical of “a certain degree of expected and beneficial maternal “sacrifice” that is for the “common good,” even if the state compensates it. [read post]