Search for: "Hall v. Law"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
When the working class threatened the interests of robber barons in late nineteenth century, for example, the illiterate and semiliterate poor were kept from the polls through literacy tests and poll taxes, not unlike the restrictive voter identification laws introduced after the Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm
Following other unsuccessful attempts, such as in Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:07 pm
Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:06 am
" (McKinney v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
In Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall [2001] EWCA Civ 2034, and in B Osborn & Co Ltd v Dior [2003] EWCA Civ 281, both concerning the validity of notices under section 20 Housing Act 1988, it was held that the same approach applied to statutory notices, and also “they also establish that notices which contain errors or omissions that are not obvious may be “substantially to the same effect” as a prescribed form if the notices nevertheless fulfil the… [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
In Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall [2001] EWCA Civ 2034, and in B Osborn & Co Ltd v Dior [2003] EWCA Civ 281, both concerning the validity of notices under section 20 Housing Act 1988, it was held that the same approach applied to statutory notices, and also “they also establish that notices which contain errors or omissions that are not obvious may be “substantially to the same effect” as a prescribed form if the notices nevertheless fulfil the… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 pm
” The recent case of Doe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
Pursuant to a choice-of-law provision, the PSA was to be construed and interpreted in accordance with California law. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:40 pm
., Wodohodsky v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am
” Hall v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Indeed, it is notable that the Court in GC et. al. v CNIL held that the sensitive data derogations set out in Articles 9(1)(g) and 10 should be construed to be self-executing in the absence of implementing law enacted at either national or Union level. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Nevertheless, this language was repeated in the much more recent case of GC et. al. v CNIL (at [37]) – a judgment which did give some emphasis to freedom of expression – and so (subject to the continuing and potentially broader role of indirect or secondary liability where publication at source is illegal) these restrictions should be taken to be good law. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm
Hall & Mark David Hall eds., Indianapolis, Liberty Fund 2007); see also Stinneford, supra, at 1769. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:24 am
In an already tight labor market, the court’s decision in United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 37 v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 10:49 am
Today’s Long Island employment law blog discusses the decision in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am
February 6, noon-1:15 PM, Georgetown University Law Center, McDonough Hall, Rm. 110, Washington, DC: "The Second Amendment Returns to the Court," panel with Clark Neily (Institute for Justice). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
Yet, that presumption lies at the foundation of our criminal justice system, requiring trial courts to instruct juries about the presumption without minimizing its importance (see CPL § 300.10[2]; People v Hall, 155 AD2d 344, 346-347 [1st Dept 1989]). [read post]
