Search for: "Havens v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 4,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And further, if state officials want to cancel referenda this year in light of the pandemic (which they haven't stated explicitly but which reasonably might be inferred), that's not a federal problem.    Man sues Missouri company, alleging that it withdrew his job offer after learning he was gay. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
And if those are the things that we’ve been fighting for . . . then I have to say it turns out we haven’t been fighting for very much. [read post]
Use in the court of trade As stated above, the most interesting point discussed by Sir Alastair Norris was whether the activities of Merck US constituted use in the UK in the course of trade. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] brought an action in federal district court alleging that the Town of East Haven, Connecticut [Town] discriminated against her because of her age in violation of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The plaintiff [Petitioner] brought an action in federal district court alleging that the Town of East Haven, Connecticut [Town] discriminated against her because of her age in violation of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. [read post]