Search for: "Hill v. California" Results 781 - 800 of 1,328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2013, 4:21 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Gallery in Beverly Hills, California sold the horns to an overseas seller for $220,000. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
Those aren't California-based, which is where most of the venture capital action in the U.S. is (Sand Hill Road). [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
Discussing the opinion at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills argues that the Court’s “textualism was patently pretextual. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
 You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Long, Emeritus Professor of Religious Studies at UC Santa Barbara, and former professor of religion at the University of Chicago, UNC Chapel Hill, Duke University, and Syracuse University. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Events 18 April 2013, 11KBW Information Law Conference, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London. 22 April 2013, IBC Legal’s 20th Anniversary Defamation & Privacy conference, Grange Tower Bridge Hill, London. 1 May 2013, The Fifth Northumbria Information Rights Conference: Changing Notions of Privacy, Northern Design Centre, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear. 2 May 2013, Reporting Mental Health and Suicide by the Media, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 9 May 2013, Valuing the… [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 4:50 am by Broc Romanek
Allergan: Delaware Supreme Court Reverses & Gives Collateral Estoppel Effect to Federal Court's Dismissal Last week, the Delaware Supreme Court overturned the Chancery decision in Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
“Absolutely; it shouldn’t be eligible for the Mark [of USDA inspection] – ought to be treated the same as lungs,” wrote one agency veterinarian based in California. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:39 pm by Andrew Weber
  On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, the Court heard arguments in the California Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but a few resolved cases: Richard Jones v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Levy & McRae Solicitors, on behalf of Christopher and Mary Gorman v The Sun, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Mr Dean Torkington v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Dr Helen Hammond v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Basim Shamsuddin v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 19/03/2013; Noveprim Group… [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The purpose of this post is surely not to startle employers operating in the financial services/insurance or retail industries, employing individuals in California or New York, or having experienced a WHD investigation into opening the pocketbooks or running for the hills. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]