Search for: "Holiday v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 2:58 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:30 am
Lyons v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:09 am
A Montana state agency had challenged the continuing vitality of the Nevada v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 3:30 pm
Co. v. 268 Ltd. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:25 am
In Chambers v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 4:10 am
See Fleming Companies v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:38 pm
In the case captioned Romeo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
As stated by Mr. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
The next day at school, a final tiebreaker vote would come down to Mikey v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:45 am
Supreme Court in the case of Estate of Thorton v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Ermini v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
For example, teachers could argue that school holidays amount to a comparable “field break” (i.e. a period of time when they are not required to work by their employer), and therefore cannot count towards the statutory entitlement to annual leave. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:24 pm
The last big preemption case, Watters v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:56 am
The case, Aslam v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:45 pm
A very sensible ruling in my opinion.Tip of the day: If you have aUK credit card and you are booking a holiday abroad, use your credit card! [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
The court referred to the well-known cases of Pan Am v Aetna (relating to the hijacking of an aircraft by the PLA in 1970) and Holiday Inns v Aetna (relating to the damage to their hotel in Beirut in the 1975/6 Lebanese civil war) [Universal Cable Products, LLC; Northern Entertainment Products, LLC, v Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, US Court of Appeal for 9th Circuit, No. 17-56672, D.C. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 6:27 pm
(Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:12 am
(It was a good holiday for Apple, too, apparently.) [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
However, the district court’s ruling that the employer was judicially estopped from challenging the methodology used to calculate overtime damages was reversed (Dacar v. [read post]
