Search for: "Holmes v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:58 am
The case is Ray v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 10:03 pm
So said Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes of the United States Supreme Court in a case that blew me away when I first encountered it in law school. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:57 am
” (United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:29 am
Holmes. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:23 pm
United States, 193 U.S. 197 (1904) (Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
" Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 HARV. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
"Law reports in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:20 am
United States (affirming damages award rejection for worker at munitions factory who had not proven causal connection between injurer’s negligence and her hypochondria symptoms). 8. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
Justice Jackson made this point in a barb at Justice Frankfurter in West Virginia State Bd of Educ. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 6:38 am
David O'Neil, Assistant to the Solicitor, will argue for 10 minutes for United States as amicus curiae supporting reversal. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
David O’Neil, Assistant to the Solicitor, will argue for 10 minutes for United States as amicus curiae supporting reversal. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
The United States as amicus will be represented by David O’Neil, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519, 1533 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:11 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals recognized that, in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
