Search for: "Houston v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 7:23 am
McCrary v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, no writ); City of Baytown v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 11:13 am
On June 12, 2021, Judge Lynn Hughes in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas found that such a requirement was legally permissible in Jennifer Bridges v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm
* The DOJ and a number of state attorneys general are suing to block the merger of American Airlines and US Airways. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:48 am
Jamal v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:39 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:11 pm
See Preston State Bank v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 1:26 pm
See, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 1:26 pm
See, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 8:11 am
Supreme Court in the landmark case Herrera v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:08 pm
-Houston [1st Dist.] 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Skeen v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:07 pm
And: Four years ago, the Supreme Court faced a similar situation in Roper v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
” O’Brien v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
The State argued that because of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:26 am
Delafuente v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:23 am
-Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, pet. denied) (citing Mattly v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
State and Pittman v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am
And the 6th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
