Search for: "Hughes, Appeal of" Results 781 - 800 of 2,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2018, 7:44 am by Dennis Crouch
  On appeal, a divided Federal Circuit has affirmed-in-part — with Judges Moore and Bryson siding with the patentee (valid under 101) and Judge Hughes arguing invalidity. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
In recognition of the policy arguments mounted in support of the appeal, it was repeatedly emphasised that not every failing in an investigation will be actionable and, in my view it is clear that the test for liability is more than mere negligence (but cf Lord Hughes at [135]). [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am by Aurora Barnes
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit filed this petition back in November 2017. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am by ELLIOT GOLD
This decision was less of a surprise than Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 – given the strength of the earlier judgments both at first instance and in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"With respect to claims of absolute immunity under common-law, the Appellate Division noted a ruling by the Court of Appeals concluded that a private citizen speaking at a public hearing "was not conferred with absolute privilege because, unlike members of the ... [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am by IAN SKELT
They might find some consolation in Lord Hughes (from [102] onwards), who did not think that the distinction between positive acts and omissions was the sole explanation for the previous decisions protective of the police. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed bench for hand-down will be Lady Hale, and Lords Carnwath and Hughes. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
McCoy then brought an appeal, arguing—among other things—that he should get a new trial because he suffered a Sixth Amendment violation when his lawyer contravened his wishes and told the jury that he was guilty of killing three people.Ineffective Assistance of CounselOne possible approach to challenging what happened at trial would have been to argue that English’s representation of McCoy was so deficient that it failed the rather lenient Strickland v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am by Aurora Barnes
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, though Lord Mance and Lord Hughes reached the conclusion that a duty of care existed by different reasoning. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]