Search for: "ILLINOIS v. MICHIGAN" Results 781 - 800 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" Dissent: Whatever the Fifth said, there's two meanings of "necessary," and this ain't the one from McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am by Ben
” In June this year the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that Mr Klinger was fr [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1: Revenue Impact of Federal Flavor Ban State Menthol cigarettes share of market Excise tax rate per pack of 20 cigarettes Total revenue decline Excise tax decline as percentage of total decline  Alabama 42% $0.675 -$83,087,724 36% Alaska 24% $2.00 -$7,403,636 62% Arizona 26% $2.00 -$60,425,192 53% Arkansas 33% $1.15 -$52,609,248 44% California 27% $2.87 -$328,526,977 63% Colorado 24% $1.94 -$46,266,930 39% Connecticut 43% $4.35 -$80,529,512 78% Delaware 51% $2.10 -$30,932,062 81%… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
 As the Ohio complaint states, “In sweeping terms, [the Rule] purports to extend federal regulatory jurisdiction over broad swaths of the country, including vast areas within the States of Ohio and Michigan, that in no way constitute navigable, potentially navigable, or interstate waters—even in various instances reaching land that is typically dry. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Over at Bloomberg Law IJers Josh Windham and Daryl James urge the Supreme Court to take up the case of Tuggle v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:32 pm by Ilya Somin
During that time, numerous state supreme courts have invalidated Keo-like “economic development” takings under their state constitutions — including Illinois, Michigan, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, and South Carolina (see this article for cites to these cases). [read post]