Search for: "IN RE MARK K" Results 781 - 800 of 1,420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
 We’re the Model-Alphabet-Letter guys here! [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Richter, 673 A.2d 888 (Pa. 1996), that Pennsylvania law has adopted, and applies, Restatement §402A, comment k across the board:  “Other [jurisdictions], including Pennsylvania, have taken a blanket approach applying comment k to preclude strict-liability design-defect claims for all prescription drugs. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:39 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
But if you think that is extreme think on this Mark Alexander’s Property118 site told us all about the case of a tenant in Ireland who ate his landlord’s heart and Lungs. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Doe Dist. of Columbia 2014http://t.co/bwPBsh4rKU -> Copyright and Access to Culture in the Digital Environment http://t.co/HUYdswrnRC -> Cloud Computing in K-12 Expands, Raising Data Privacy Concerns http://t.co/yiQ8sXEDqB -> Rockstar's addition of Google as defendant to Samsung case could keep patent suit in Texas http://t.co/aQrMIiCiKo -> French fine Google over change in privacy policy http://t.co/KS9CqlA7d5 -> EU Commission to review copyright: public consultation open… [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:49 am by Michael Markarian
Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mark Kirk, R-Ill., Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., and David Vitter, R-La., and Reps. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Individuals generally receive such coverage in one of four ways:  (i) through Medicaid, if they’re eligible; (ii) through Medicare, if they’re eligible; (iii) through an employer-provided insurance plan, if their employer offers one; or (iv) on the government “exchange,” if the individual is not covered in one of the other three ways. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:23 am by Employment Lawyers
Smith's senior season is eventually slowed by a re-injured ankle.June 3, 1985: Danny Sullivan earned his cover appearance following his remarkable "Spin and Win" victory at the Indy 500. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Ron Coleman
 It seems they’re always flawed, but why? [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
And if we’re talking about famous marks, then of course we’re going to talk about dilution. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Bill Marler
Amended ¶3-304.17(A) to clarify conditions under which the re-use of returnables are permitted. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  When asked “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear the name ‘Charbucks,’ spelled C‐H‐A‐R‐B‐U‐C‐K‐S? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Hence, the ED examined and decided upon a request that was (no longer) part of the proceedings and, thus, upon a text to which the appellant (no longer) agreed to in the sense of A 113(2).The provision of A 113(2) marks a fundamental procedural principle and is of such prime importance that any infringement of it must be considered to be a substantial procedural violation (see T 1854/08 [2.1]; T 690/09 [8]).[5] In addition to this infringement of A 113(2), the decision under appeal suffers… [read post]