Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 781 - 800
of 953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2017, 6:33 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
The ramification of the decision in Ehrenfeld v Bin Mahfouz ([2005] EWHC 1156 (QB)) are still continuing to be felt both at home and abroad. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
The Inforrm blog has also posted on this here, in a post that sets out the issues on the appeal and the crucial part of the judgment. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
If you are interested in catching up with last week’s events before following next week’s proceedings, check out the excellent coverage of the Inquiry by the Inforrm’s Blog (which also provides us with a comprehensive Law and Media news roundup). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
One of the possibilities being considered by Lord Justice Leveson as he writes the Report for Part 1 of his Inquiry is whether there should be compulsory regulation of the print media. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
In the case of Sousa Goucha v Portugal ([2016] ECHR 284) the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the dismissal of a domestic defamation action by a gay television presenter was not a breach of his Article 8 right to reputation or of the prohibition of discrimination in Article 14. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm
As Hugh Tomlinson QC notes on the Inforrm blog, it’s a ‘difficult’ case, ‘which is likely to produce a definitive restatement of the principles which apply when a party is seeking to derogate from the principles of open justice’. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
As argued this week by Brian Cathart for Inforrm, the closing days of the campaign demonstrated editors’ flagrant disregard for the Editor’s Code, which requires that the press “distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact”. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:55 am
In the case of Giesbert v France ([2017] ECHR 504, 1 June 2017)(French only) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that Court orders made against the magazine, Le Point, sanctioning the publication of criminal court documents in the high profile “Bettancourt” case did not violate Article 10 of the Convention. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
Inforrm’s Blog features the article, originally published by The Conversation, that argues “trusted flaggers” can reduce the proliferation of harmful content on social media. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm
This post is the second part of two posts on the draft Online Safety Bill. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
Inforrm have recently commented on the Ministry of Justice’s privacy injunction statistics for 2017 here, where it was reported that there were 2 final privacy injunction proceedings in 2017 and only one that resulted in a final undertaking. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
In the case of Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown ([2015] EWHC 2628 (QB))(16 September 2015) Warby J granted a permanent injunction against the unknown operators of the “Solicitors from Hell UK” website. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Inforrm reports here and here. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
We wrote an Inforrm blog post on the first judgment here. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm
This post by Mark Thomson first appeared on the media law blog Inforrm, and is reproduced with permission and thanks This was another privacy injunction case about anonymity. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
The Prime Minister has said that he is “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
