Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 781 - 800
of 42,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2013, 2:33 pm
Drafting Articles of Organization C. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:55 am
The case required the court to determine whether an interest rate increase constituted a "change in terms" under Regulation Z, 12 CFR § 226.9(c) [text], which requires that a creditor provide a cardholder with a change-in-terms... [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 6:56 am
.) -- concluding that ATF properly relied on Exemption 7(C) in refusing to confirm or deny existence of agency’s involvement in alleged 2018 gun incident involving Hunter Biden; finding that public interest in agency’s handling of this matter was “significant,” but that it was outweighed by subject’s “remarkably strong” privacy interest. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 8:08 am
C. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:59 am
Marshals Service properly issued Exemption 7(C) Glomar in response to plaintiff’s request for records concerning his brother, who is alive and did not consent to disclosure; rejecting plaintiff’s personal interest in records for probate proceeding as sufficient to override subject’s privacy interests. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 11:16 am
July 8, 2010), Judge Kozinski’s panel opinion is an interesting read, but the main take-away appears to be:(1) nominative fair use is not an affirmative defense, but instead replaces the traditional multi-factor likelihood of confusion test in cases where the accused infringer asserts that he is indeed referring to the plaintiff’s mark; and(2) the trademark owner bears the burden of proving that the asserted nominative use will cause confusion (i.e., is not “fair”)… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:53 pm
From SSRN:Ashlie C. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:44 am
You can follow them live on C-Span. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:48 am
L. c. 266, § 30. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:45 am
In fact, its mere existence and wide-spread discussion has boosted the recognition of this unique and revolutionary creation, its creators Peter Varkony and Gábor Domokos, and – last but not least – helped in further refining a number of interesting aspects of shape mark protection. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 8:12 am
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-275/06 Promusicae v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:04 am
While Scott continued by arguing that the Commission already has equivalent regulatory powers and is not interested in regulating user content, the confirmation that Bill C-11 currently does cover user generated content should put an end to the government’s gaslighting that it does not. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:29 am
C. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:33 am
Interesting post at the Conglomerate blog on the corrosive effects of law school. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:34 am
Unless a reasonable rate of interest is assessed, participant loans may result in a prohibited transaction (see DOL Regulation section 2550.408b-1(a) and Internal Revenue Code section 4975(c)(1)(B)). [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:21 pm
To establish a RLUIPA claim, a plaintiff must have “an ownership, leasehold, easement, servitude, or other property interest in the regulated land or a contract or option to acquire such an interest. [read post]
28 May 2007, 10:01 pm
As I noted over at Prawfs, I blame a combination of packing, grading, and moving (three of my least favorite activities), but, c'est la vie. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
In doing so, she only advanced, and acted as a spokesperson in black robes for, the sectarian interests of the Episcopal Forum to which she still (presumably -- the organization no longer publishes the names of its members) belongs. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:48 am
The News of the World story is undoubtedly a good one and raises serious public interest issues. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Anthony C. [read post]
