Search for: "In Interest of Wagner"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
Both Halsbury’s Law Exchange and the 11KBW Panopticon commented on the case and highlighted that its outcome is the result of a balancing exercise between the competing public interest in bringing properties back into reuse and the public interest in preventing crime. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:05 am
Adam Wagner’s contribution (another lawyer singled out for an ‘Aldridging’) to ‘enlightenment’ in the excellent UK Human Rights blog may well bring him and others a higher profile – but it is all free and I am more than happy to see Wagner and others gain benefit should that happen as a result of the first class law blogging. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:32 am
Very interesting & recommended. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:45 pm
But as long as the footage is available any creative and knowledgeable editor will be able to make it interesting. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
Also, this draft article by David Abrams and Polk Wagner suggests that first-to-file systems impact solo inventors. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
(Orin Kerr) National Journal has the story, and Patently O has lots of good stuff for context.Along similar lines, David Abrams and Polk Wagner have just posted an interesting new draft paper on one of the major questions addressed by the patent reform bill: Priority Rules: An Empirical Exploration of First-to-Invent Versus First-to-File. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
Interesting and recommended. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:44 pm
Congress may find it quite interesting - although it could be that they feel constrained by international harmonization impulses to change to first to file anyway. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:48 am
SignOnSanDiego reports an interesting civilian case, but sufficiently relevant for this weekend. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:28 pm
Adam Wagner posted a brief note about the press release with links to other commentaries by the Inforrm’s Blog and the Pink Tape. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:39 pm
An injunction which was designed to protect the interest of a child was repeatedly breached by the losing party in litigation, encouraged and assisted by a number of websites and by Mr Hemming’s abuse of parliamentary privilege. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:03 am
August 18, 2011 Adam Wagner Are human rights to blame for the riots? [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
In conjunction with the tabling of the proposed rule, the WPCB invited interested persons to submit additional written comments to IDEM by July 29, 2011. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
by: Robert Wagner, intellectual property attorney at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:14 am
Anyone interested in discussing the case for open digital justice further can join the Google group at this link. 1. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
I hosted a Without Prejudice podcast on the subject last week with regular panelists Carl Gardner, David Allen Green and guests Dr Evan Harris, solicitor David Wales and human rights barrister Adam Wagner. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
See Adam Wagner’s post on the guide here and Lucy Reed’s (of Pink Tape) link of this to an interesting idea about using information from family cases as case studies. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Wagner, Wendy, Katherine Barnes and Lisa Peters. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
Wagner. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:54 pm
Regardless of that, it’s a pleasant surprise, because this is a really useful document for lawyer practitioners and for judges, albeit probably a bit inaccessible for non-legal interested minds. [read post]
