Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 781 - 800
of 5,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2023, 12:15 am
In re Massey Energy Co., No. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
You're right. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
Barnwell, 41 Cal. 4th 1038, 1052 (2007); In re George T., 33 Cal. 4th 620, 630-31 (2004), and a credibility finding cannot be "reevaluat[ed]" and must be affirmed unless the content of the witness's testimony was "physically impossible" or its truth or falsity evident without resort to inferences or deductions, People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:39 pm
So they're still on a break. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
They're technically orders from a court, and you're only ordered to do what they actually order you to do.No longer, I guess. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:21 pm
"You're right. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
You're driving along the I-5 (or whatever) and all of the sudden an ambulance negligently sideswipes your vehicle. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Some are fairly easy.This is an example of the latter.California law provides that if you're on parole, and have finished up a year, you're required to be discharged from parole within 30 days. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:13 pm
You're a plaintiff's lawyer doing a wage and hour representative action against Marshalls. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:42 pm
It's bad enough when you're paying for something with a counterfeit $100 bill. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 12:33 pm
Only one published opinion thus far from the California Court of Appeal, and that one's not especially worth reading -- that is, unless you're keenly interested in finding out whether someone who tried to help the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians open a casino gets paid. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:24 pm
Because you're supposed to have panels of . . . wait for it . . . three.Three is better than two. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm
I'm glad there are cases (and procedures) like this one.Criminal Defendant fraudulently gets Victim to sign various mortgage documents by pretending that they're something else, and funnels the money to herself. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:04 pm
But statistically, doesn't it seem like you're more likely than not wrong? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:07 pm
You gotta be hating the Court of Appeal if you're the losing attorney in this one.Whereas thanking your lucky stars for the Court of Appeal's (unsolicited) help if you're on the other side. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:19 am
Who's going to agree to serve as a receiver when you're (not) paid like this? [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:38 pm
So what if you're mentally incompetent to stand trial, and are so delusional that you can't even understand the nature of the proceedings against you? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:16 am
If your DNA is found on a rock used to smash a window, and that's how a burglar got into a building, is that evidence alone sufficient to prove that you're guilty of burglary? [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:47 pm
Doesn't matter if you're a driver, passenger, or whatever. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
If you're broke and in need of Christmas presents for your kids -- in addition to crack cocaine -- please consider an income-producing strategy other than bludgeoning and strangling to death a 73-year old woman who lives near you.Wholly apart from morality, although the "murder" approach may have relatively high short-term gains, it will ultimately lead to you being sentenced to death.A sentence that the California Supreme Court -- in an opinion by Justice Liu -- will… [read post]
