Search for: "In Re First Federal Corp." Results 781 - 800 of 3,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
Over objection, President Clinton’s secret service guards were ordered to testify before the grand jury during the Lewinsky scandal (In re Sealed Case, 1998), but presidents have nonetheless continued to rely on the discretion of the Secret Service. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:23 am by Vishnu Kannan
Hayes, director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement; Commander Jonathan White, United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But with billions of dollars at stake, the powerful defense industry has helped the lobbying corps contain GOP defections. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The $9,500 fine levied against Ring Power Corp., which sells and leases industrial machinery, represents a rare penalty for a company found to have violated a 75-year-old ban on campaign contributions from federal contractors. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A price impact analysis of the 152 first-identified securities class action complaints against directors and officers of U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Jesse Morton, Mitchell D. Silber
The first U.S. iteration of PVE/CVE was focused predominately on al-Qaeda-inspired jihadism. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Mme Théberge, an experienced senior bureaucrat, is the first vice-chair and CEO of the Board in its thirty-year history who has not been a lawyer or had a law degree. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
First, that’s new law as far as I’m aware, and given the First Amendment implications of applying dilution law to comparative advertising, it’s not a well-justified decision. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
” He was referring, of course, to Air & Liquid Systems Corp v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
First, the Hospital asserts the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury's finding that the Hospital agreed to pay the Nurses fixed salaries. [read post]