Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Matter"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm
Prosecutors argued that the Grand Jury probe was being stalled by the delay in obtaining the Twitter account information.Judge O'Grady denied the petitioners' request because they failed to make a "strong showing" of success on appeal. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
” Sullivan involved the issue of what the jury had considered in returning an indictment, and the concurring opinion produced the quote of the year: “Even if the hoary aphorism that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich were true, such a result should still make clear that the grand jury considered what the sandwich allegedly did. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:07 pm
He has been jailed since he was indicted in June 2009 by a federal grand jury in Houston, where his companies were headquartered. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:50 pm
” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 643 F.2d 226, 228 (5th Cir.1981). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:54 pm
Not unless the jury says so. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:20 pm
Refusing to talk to a grand jury without use immunity is a reasonable stance for someone to take even if she thinks she hasn’t done anything wrong—especially where, as here, the grand jury’s investigation appears to have political overtones. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
But it’s an entirely different matter when you’re talking about crimes which occurred over several years, and a trial which would take over two months. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
" The Court's decision was based, in part, on: the untruthful testimony of an FBI agent to the grand jury; the provision of false information in applications for search and seizure warrants; the improper review of e-mail communications between a defendant and her lawyer; the failure to comply with discovery obligations and other court rulings; and misrepresentations to the Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
The majority in In re Grand Jury Matter, Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc), held that it was indeed constitutional to prosecute an author for allegedly defrauding a publisher and a movie producer based on the author’s alleged misrepresentations about his contacts with Pope John Paul II, misrepresentations that appeared in the book itself. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
The majority in In re Grand Jury Matter, Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc), held that it was indeed constitutional to prosecute an author for allegedly defrauding a publisher and a movie producer based on the author’s alleged misrepresentations about his contacts with Pope John Paul II, misrepresentations that appeared in the book itself. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:25 am
” But she then very wrongly said it’s “because the perception of the public could be that you're dealing with convicted felons and that may not go over well. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:25 am
” But she then very wrongly said it’s “because the perception of the public could be that you're dealing with convicted felons and that may not go over well. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:54 am
Your choice does matter. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
This is a very serious matter. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
The issues relating to Curley, Schultz and McQueary are all pretty simple: either McQueary or Curley & Schultz lied to a grand jury. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
No one can say for sure, of course, since grand jury proceedings are highly secretive affairs. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
They're heroes. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm
A grand jury then indicted her for the offense of injury to a child. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm
A grand jury then indicted her for the offense of injury to a child. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:38 am
Unless you live under a rock, you've heard about the grand jury indictment of former Penn State assistant coach, Jerry Sandusky. [read post]
