Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 9" Results 781 - 800 of 871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2009, 2:44 am
”     The question then is whether Visitalk’s status as debtor in possession at the time it initiated the claim triggered the I v I exclusion. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
Instead, the focus must shift to the already initiated legislative reform of Regulation 44/2001. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:02 am
The adoptive parents claim that his failure to file it in the proper court nullified the motion; Bartholomew Superior Judge Chris Monroe determined that W.G. had failed to follow the statutory requirements to contest that adoption in Superior Court in a timely fashion, and his consent was irrevocably implied because of that.The father argued that Indiana Code Sections 31-19-4-5 and -9-12 are in conflict because they require the putative father to file a motion to contest the adoption or to… [read post]
Supremes acknowledge problems created by San Antonio courts' rotating docket system and dispense with abatement procedure.In Re Schmitz (Tex. 2009)No. 07-0581 (Tex. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) CAFC Judge Rader: ‘Stronger IP system allows countries to compete in world marketplace’ (PatentlyBIOtech) Professor Mossoff’s historical paper about patent thickets, patent trolls and patent pools: relevant today (IP Dragon) The balance between standards and patent regulation (IP Frontline) Patents in a bear market (IP Solutions)   Australia Full Federal Court: Commonsense approach to trade mark use and the beer/wine dichotomy confirmed:… [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:44 am
The Clerk's Offices are all open Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(IP Frontline)   US Patents Percentage of patents that were initially rejected (Patently-O) Design patents: Sailing through the PTO (Patently-O) Patents and the auto industry bailout (Patently-O) Tips for assisting the judge and jury in patent cases (IP Watchdog) US patent counts, Q1 2009 (Patent Librarian's Notebook) What good are patent method claims? [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
The instant proceedings were initiated by Father's petition to relocate along with the children to South Carolina. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
  Restaurant list below (we're adding more every day!). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
Stanford Group Co. in April 2008 in Houston's 189th District Court after SGC initiated arbitration proceedings against them. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Bryant Health Center, Inc. (9-CA-43747, 44012; 353 NLRB No. 80) Ironton, OH Jan. 30, 2009. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:19 am
They have no place to go for help when the prison administrators and guards frequently retaliate against them for filing 602 ´s, habeas corpus petitions and other legal actions such as lawsuits. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:33 pm
The court instead dated it 2007, when it received the petition. [read post]