Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 781 - 800
of 5,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 7:25 pm
Section 210 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-10) is amended by striking subsection (c). [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
As such, it is difficult to say how much of an impact section 1(2) (which was a last-minute amendment to the Act) has had. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:51 am
You can change your payment schedule by amending your Chapter 13 plan. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:47 am
This is a change from the Proposed Rules which would have required disclosure of such decision either in the Form 10-Q or Form 10-K. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
"[T]he net neutrality rule violates the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
Background, Rationale and Dissent The classification of a deposit as “brokered” is significant because (1) banks deemed less than well capitalized (including because of exam ratings) generally cannot pursue or rollover such deposits, (2) such deposits can result in higher bank expenses, and (3) as a prudential matter, they can be viewed by regulators as less stable than nonbrokered deposits, thus causing higher examination scrutiny. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:06 am
The May 10 Ruling. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:59 pm
Filed under: Copyright Infringement, Fair Use, First Amendment, Literary Materials, Trademark Dilution Act Tagged: Copyright Infringement, Fair Use, First Amendment [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:00 am
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Does 1–47, 2012 WL 4005842, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am
But the Court in Free Enterprise otherwise left intact Reorganization Plan Number 10 of 1950 (15 Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 12:46 pm
SEC also found that by way of Ottimo’s Form U4 being misleading and inaccurate, he violated FINRA Rules 1122 and NASD IM-1000-1. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
If the law needs to be reviewed with a view to possible amendment, that is not a matter for the Supreme Court, whose proper constitutional function is to declare and apply the law. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:29 pm
Sources: https://reason.com/blog/2015/10/05/3-supreme-court-cases-to-watch-in-fall-2 Image Credit: http://www.freeimages.com/photo/supreme-court-1-1224507 See Our Related Video from our YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArnoldSmithPLLC? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The only parts of the law that were exempt from amendment were international family and inheritance law, those already having been reformed in 1989. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
First, he tried--mostly unsuccessfully--to say that Gingles step 1 and the subsequent cases already contain or at least do not rule out a requirement of race-neutrality in the construction of the plaintiffs' alternative map. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:11 pm
[Id., at p. 10]. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:12 pm
While OCR had issued certain regulations implementing some of the HITECH Act changes, it waited to published updated regulations necessary to implement other HITECH Act changes until it could complete a more comprehensive restatement of its previously published HIPAA regulations to reflect both the HITECH Act amendments and other refinements to its HIPAA Rules. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm
Don’t allocate $10 to wages in an employment dispute. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 7:03 am
These cases have dried up somewhat as the courts have broadly applied the Supreme Court's ruling in Garcetti v. [read post]
