Search for: "Intel Corporation"
Results 781 - 800
of 890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Intel Corporation, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Nov. 29, 2007), the Illinois Supreme Court applied Illinois choice-of-law principles and declined to apply California law (including the UCL and CLRA) in a putative nationwide class action against Intel: [T]he parties concede that Illinois and California laws conflict and this conflict may have an outcome-determinative difference. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:59 pm
This year saw the establishment of the Green Grid, a consortium of vendors including AMD, APC, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems and VMware, collaborating to make data centers more efficient. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 2:00 am
The rest are bound for upscale American homes under OLPC's $399 Give One, Get One scheme, which started November 12 and was only supposed to run for two weeks but has been extended to December 31.Oh, yes, and Intel is giving 3,000 of its competing Classmates to Nigeria.IPBiz wonders what the Coalition for Patent Fairness has to say about this? [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:35 pm
The Supreme Court has accepted cert on the following issue: Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding … that respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of product under the license to petitioners. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:54 pm
LG and Intel Corporation entered into a licensing agreement that granted Intel authority to sell microprocessors and chipsets embodying essential features of LG’s patents. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
”The government takes corporate fraud seriously. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:24 pm
One of the red-meat brethren of corporations clamoring for statutory patent evisceration, Intel, inked a $250 million dollar agreement with Transmeta, settling patent infringement charges leveled in 2006. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 8:40 am
[JURIST] The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) [official website] will not open a formal investigation into allegations that computer chip maker Intel offered unfair discounts to convince computer makers to buy its products over those made by rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) [corporate websites], according to the New York Times Monday, citing unnamed officials and lawyers involved in the matter [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 8:28 am
Chief Balks at Intel Inquiry [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:34 am
Introduction Biopiracy is an accusation that has been leveled at multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology corporations that engage in the practice of traveling to biologically-diverse third-world countries, accumulating traditional or indigenous knowledge about native wildlife, and patenting the "discoveries" as their own. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
" [29] The EU is beginning proceedings against several other companies, such as Intel and Rambus. [30] Companies such as Apple, Intel, and Qualcomm are also all under investigation by the European Commission [31], and companies such as Google in the DoubleClick deal have been under extra scrutiny in light of the Microsoft decision. [32] The EU has demonstrated that it will not allow intellectual property rights to stand in the way of what they… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:25 am
[JURIST] Intel [corporate website] has asked the European Commission (EC) [official website] to extend its October 8 deadline to respond to antitrust accusations [press release; JURIST report] prepared by the EC in July over Intel's price and rebate tactics, which the EC said had the effect of driving smaller companies, such as Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) [corporate website] out of the market. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 9:33 am
Intel, when it was smaller, aggressively asserted its patents and became the powerhouse it is today. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:58 pm
The list is run by a government contractor Computer Sciences Corporation. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:53 pm
The question presented by petitioner Quanta is: Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts of appeals, that respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of products under the license to petitioners. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:54 am
The question proposed by the petitioners is"Whether the Federal Cricuit erred by holding . . . that respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of product under the license to petitioners. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
Specifically, the cert. petition asks:Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts of appeals, thatr respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of product under the license to petitioners.On April 16, 2007, the Court invited briefing in the case from the Solicitor General. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:11 am
Question presented: “Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts of appeals, that respondent’s patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel’s subsequent sale of products under the license to petitioners. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:32 am
Our previous coverage of the case can be found in these two posts.The question presented is:Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts of appeals, that respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of the product under the license to petitioners. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:02 am
Intel Corporation, et al. (08/24/2007): appeal of decision dismissing plaintiff's claims for correction of inventorship and several state law claims (vacated, reversed, and remanded); discussion of patent related to optoelectronic assemblies (U.S. [read post]
