Search for: "Jacobs v. Jacobs"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2021, 10:30 pm
1:Terms of EngagementPart II: Voice2:Lauterpacht in Jerusalem3:'The Extreme Non-Zionist, Apolitical Concept of Jewish Public Life'Part III: Protection4:From a 'Marginal Problem' to the 'Supreme International Jurisdiction'5:'A False and Perverse Doctrine'Part IV: Refuge6:Sovereign Sensibilities and Jewish Refugees7:'A Better Remedy'Part V: CreedEpilogue: Revolutionaries, Torchbearers, and Imperfect SubjectsFurther information is available… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In Zarda v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Citron (Touro University, Jacob F. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:32 pm
The most recent ruling, Jacob Ayers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
In Hutterville Hutterian Brethren v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
"Judge Jacobs dissents, siding with the courts that have more narrowly interpreted Dodd-Frank. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Knott One Danger of Talking to the Press about a Pending Lawsuit Is Being Sued for Defamation (See Jacobs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Faden, PH.D., et al., Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C., et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:16 pm
Blehm v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals brings the habeas petition back, granting Martinez a rare exception to the blown-deadline rule.The case is Martinez v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:35 am
It concerns whether the Second Circuit (Jacobs, Leval and Lynch) has jurisdiction to even hear the appeal.The district court struck some of the plaintiffs' claims under the anti-SLAPP law, but other claims remained. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:57 am
The Court of Appeals resolved these issues in a case involving the Mayor of the Village of Moncticello.The case is Johnstone v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 7:06 pm
Under Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation law, employees who quit their jobs are generally ineligible for UC benefits - unless the employee has a "necessitous and compelling" reason to quit.Today, the Commonwealth Court issued an opinion on this issue in Jacobs v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:01 pm
From 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM, Sir Robin Jacob is chairing an event focused on the tension between copyright law (providing incentives for creativity) and freedom of expression (preserving access to works for socially valuable uses) in the US, UK and Europe. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:34 am
The case is Humphreys v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 5:57 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Cabranes and Menashi) vacates summary judgment in favor of the MTA and remands the case to see if the MTA was providing the disabled plaintiffs a reasonable accommodation.The case is Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:03 pm
That was 50 years ago today, in Gideon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 5:55 am
" The Court of Appeals says plaintiff has no case.The case is Cintron v. [read post]
