Search for: "James Phillips"
Results 781 - 800
of 912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
Phillips, The Lochner Court, Myth and Reality: Substantive Due Process from the 1890s to the 1930s (2000); G. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
James C. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am
. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
by Collin, Dallas and Denton County DWI Attorney Troy Burleson If you have been charged with a Collin, Dallas or Denton county DWI, chances are you were asked to do field tests by the officer who arrested you. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Donabedian, Devon Van Noble, Erik Phillips-Nania,Emily Parish and Jennifer L. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
From the next edition: Relief granted Roy Phillip Ballard v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
On Wednesday 1 February 2012, judgment was handed down in the cases of Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN, (heard 28 and 29 November 2011). [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in Senegal,… [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
In July 2005, Phillip was mobilized by the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:09 pm
” Guardian lawyer Gill Phillips said the statement clearly showed Surrey Police linked the potential deletions to the News of the World in 2002, but admitted her paper had made an error in reporting the cause of the deletions as fact rather than the belief of several people involved in the case. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
”Maybe Clinton could have overcome even that barrage, but information like this makes it much harder to take seriously the “Clinton blew it in Michigan by not doing enough campaigning there” narrative.Also, there is now more than circumstantial evidence to support the idea that former FBI Director James Comey’s October 28 letter to Congress regarding possibly relevant emails in the Clinton investigation really did make all the difference in the… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Head of Legal points out that the Culture, Media and Sport select committee will not be able to compel answers from Rupert and James Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Alison Phillips & Catherine Beatrice Phillips eds., Cambridge Univ. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USTR releases Special 301 Report ‘Priority Watch List’ (Public Knowledge) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Patent Docs) (I/P Updates) (IP Dragon) (Afro-IP) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709… [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:05 pm
In response to this, ex MP John Hemming has rolled out (in The Times and elsewhere) to say that : “Sir James Munby, the most senior family court judge in the country, has launched a drive for transparency but this case shows that it isn’t working…journalists have been told that they can’t enter a public building, let alone listen to a hearing…The East London Family Court must be the most secret court in the country. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
District Judge James C. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Gerald Godoy v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:26 am
” " Phillip W. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:41 am
Can Matt Barkley replace bum quarterback Phillip Rivers and live up to the legacy of the great Stan Humphries? [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
