Search for: "John Doe V" Results 781 - 800 of 14,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
Michael Abramowicz over at Concurring Opinions has an interesting post about the ongoing litigation between economists John Lott and Steven Levitt. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:57 pm
If there is a separate brief for Appellee "John Does 2-10", the ILB has not yet received a copy; other than that, the list should now be complete. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:26 pm by scanner1
NATALIYA SEIDEL-JOUKOVA, a/k/a NATALIYA SEIDEL JOUKOVA, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
" — Douglas Brinkley "John Marshall Harlan is one of the most fascinating and important figures of modern America, and this book does him justice. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John… [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
Yahoo does not claim ownership of Content you submit or make available for inclusion on the Service. . . . [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:48 am by Ted Frank
The only thing it does is to preclude a class action that would rip off the vast majority of consumers for the benefit of attorneys. [read post]