Search for: "Johnson v. Texas"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Texas Governor Greg Abbott directed the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and other state agencies to investigate as “child abuse” any gender-affirming health care treatments given to children under eighteen. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Finally, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:14 pm
In Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
” Texas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Sometimes, though, the matter is indeed controversial, as in Texas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:18 pm
Texas (No. 05-11304); the Houston Chronicle's Patty Reinert reports here on yesterday's opinions; and Todd J. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:00 am
(IAM) US: Johnson & Johnson – 5 year exclusivity period would kill incentives to innovate (Patent Docs) US: CHI CEO on patent reform and follow-on biologics legislation (Patent Docs) US: BIO urges Congress on patent reform: First, do no harm (Patent Baristas) US: Pharmaceutical advertising: How to use a domain name to circumvent application of law (Domain Name / Nom De Domaine!) [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
Ramos v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
United States of America (Immigration, SB 1070) Merits brief in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wade, which it published the same day Lyndon Johnson died in Texas. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:56 am
Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 6:41 am
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court in the 2009 case, State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
Title: Jones v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:10 am
(See Watts v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
United States, holding that the Court’s 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:58 am
Kellogs v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am
Some Appellate Division decisions, on which the Appellate Division here relied, have applied strict privity to estate planning malpractice lawsuits commenced by the estate's personal representative and beneficiaries alike (Deeb v Johnson, 170 AD2d 865 [3d Dept 1991]; Spivey, 138 AD2d at 564; Viscardi v Lerner, 125 AD2d 662, 663-664 [2d Dept 1986]; Rossi v Boehner, 116 AD2d 636 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Texas v. [read post]
