Search for: "Jones v. Billings" Results 781 - 800 of 1,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
Following up on Bill's post yesterday, the WSJ has this story by Ashby Jones and this editorial on the flap over King and Spalding's bailing out of the Defense of Marriage Act case and Paul Clement's bailing out of King and Spalding.As Bill noted, CJLF takes no position on the underlying DOMA controversy. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm by Eugene Lee
Tell Counsel about the high cost bills you have gotten converted to judgments against the Plaintiff. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
The House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet held a hearing on "Promoting Investment and Protecting Commerce Online: Legitimate Sites v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
Accordingly, Judge Gleeson, citing the Appellate Division’s ruling in Jones v Westchester County, 644 NY2d 640, granted the State’s motion to summarily dismiss this branch of Sanni’s complaint. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am by Law Office of D. Hardison Wood
 If passed, this bill (note: this is v.1, we are actually onto v.6 now) will impact you on a daily basis. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
"With orphan works are back where we started, says the AmeriKat, why can't the US government just once and for all pass a bill like the Shawn Bentley Bill? [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am by Melina Padron
Second, this week the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Jones v Kaney that expert witnesses are no longer immune from civil suits. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, under the doctrine established in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) a claimant may apply to have a claim struck out as an abuse of process on the basis that it does not involve the commission of a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
 The Government’s Draft Defamation Bill was released on 15 March 2011. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
We mentioned the British Columbia case of Lawson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
So too, there is the very real potential for trivial claims to be struck under Dow Jones & Co Inc v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75, [2005] QB 946 for abuse of process. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Kali Borkoski
The Iowa Independent reports on a bill in the Iowa Legislature that would align the state law with the Court’s holding in Graham v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It may have been that Ms Ehrenfeld had a potential defences to the claim – she could have set up a Reynolds defence of responsible journalism, or that she could have argued that it should be struck out as an abuse of process on Jameel grounds (Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
Oral Arguments: Bond v. [read post]