Search for: "KELLY v. STATE"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Bookstores v Auxiliary Serv. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Kelly was not with him.] [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:00 am
This case, Linde et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:48 am
MCINTOSH v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:58 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
Affirmed.Case Name: EVELYN DIFELICI, f/k/a EVELYN BARNES v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
Supreme Court survive overturning Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
State, supra (quoting Brown v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Kelly, 23 F.3d 507, 511 (D.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Justice Weaver, joined by Justice Hathaway, issued a separate dissenting opinion agreeing with Justice Young’s criticism that the new rule will have unforseen consequences, and stating that “the majority’s unrestrained decision today is a huge mistake. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dwayne Kelly v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 10:01 am
State Univ., 161 F.3d 276, 280 (5th Cir. 1998) (same); with D'Angelo v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:02 am
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF: KIRK JACOBS v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
The petition in Kelly v. [read post]
