Search for: "Keene v. Keene"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2010, 10:22 am
Long ago, the court in Singer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
However, this Kat, who has recently returned from an inspiring trip to Belgrade, is heartened to learn that our friends in the region have plenty to laugh about too -- and that there are some keen senses of humour at play, as we discover from Bogdan Ivanišević (Head of IP Practice, BDK Advokati/Attorneys at Law, Belgrade), who has guested us the following tale:Mockery via use of someone else’s footage: parody or satire, and does the difference matter? [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Robert Engelhart QC, is a fascinating case which has much to teach the business community and the design profession. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Yet the members of the current Court have a keen understanding of the long, dark chapters in the story of American democracy, as well as an acute awareness of the structural devices that have impeded public sentiment from registering in elections, appointments, and policy more broadly. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
" Keene v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm
In his 1989 dissent, as now, Stevens appeared to be motivated, at least in part, by his keen sense of patriotism, enhanced by his service in the U.S. military in World War II. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Roxanne Keen v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:51 am
The recent libel judgment handed down in Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB) has made headlines around the world and has captured the attention of the public. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 10:27 am
Perry v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:26 am
" State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
On 1 March 2011, permission to appeal was refused on the papers (by Sir David Keene) in the case of Wallis v Meredith. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
Chasewood Park Residents Ltd v Kim [2010] EWHC 579 (Ch) is a rent/service charges case that should serve as a useful object lesson: first for parties to remind them of the importance of precise pleading and the use of evidence; and second, I hope, to first instance judges as to the perils of abandoning the normal formalities of a trial. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: District Court Massachusetts allows pubic broadcast of RIAA file-sharing lawsuit: BMG v Tenenbaum (Techdirt) (Excess Copyright) (Ars Technica) Court in Shenzhen convicts 11 people in Microsoft piracy case (Managing Intellectual Property) (IP Dragon) Obama’s Canadian visit and copyright (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright)… [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
In 2001, in Zadvydas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Senior Treasury officials weren't keen on the FDIC's program because of the large gap between potential buyers and sellers. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:35 pm
July 11, 2016) Keene v. [read post]
