Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 12:29 pm
As the First Circuit stated in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Orin Kerr and Benjamin Wittes hosted a Facebook “live” with initial reactions following oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
See, e.g., Hill v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” Whitney Cooney discusses the cert denial in Severson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:17 am
The narrow 5-4 decision in US v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 5:45 am
And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has an interesting post titled "United States v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:03 am
Kerr was executed last night, making Texas the third state to use pentobarbital, a sedative used to euthanize animals, to carry out an execution. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 7:13 am
When last we left the Lori Drew prosecution, Judge George Wu had laid some issues on the table and Orin Kerr had joined the defense team. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson conclude that there was no basis for the presumption and, accordingly, the judge erred in dismissing the appellant’s application relying on that observation. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
Lord Hope stated: “They [the ISA] must make their own assessment of the reliability of the evidence. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:04 pm
Consider State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
These appeals are being heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Judge, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am
Kerr LJ stated that, at the least, “it cannot be said that it was plainly not open” to Hamblen J to reach the conclusion he did, and therefore the Court of Appeal should not have interfered with his judgment to that effect. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:47 am
Jaffe and New York Times v. [read post]
