Search for: "Lang, in Re"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,024
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2011, 3:10 am
Cal. 2008) for the proposition that the doctrine of intervening rights applies to re-issued patents and does not extend to certificates of correction. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Cir. 1996) as well as In re Portola Packaging Inc., 110 F.3d 786, 42 USPQ2d 1295 (Fed. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
However, as made clear by the CAFC last week (In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation) not every victory shows up in USPTO statistics as cancelled/amended claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
We're still in shock that it ended like this -- so abruptly, so senselessly. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
. : University Press of Kansas, c2010.Appellate Advocacy(RES) KF251 .B42 2010A practical guide to appellate advocacy / Mary Beth Beazley.Beazley, Mary Beth, 1957-Austin [Tex.] : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business ; New York : Aspen Publishers, c2010.BankruptcyKF1524 .C4194 2010Chapter 7 consumer bankruptcy strategies : leading lawyers on preparing a chapter 7 filing, establishing effective client strategies, and understanding recent trends. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Last week, In re Stepan posed this very issue to the CAFC, albeit in the context of a Board affirmance in patent reexamination. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Last Friday, In re Mostafazadeh was argued before the CAFC (argument here). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Yet, as one defendant found out recently, perceived gamesmanship in patent reexamination tactics may re-direct that very same bullet to one’s foot. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
House and Senate Focus on Moving Forward The Senate may begin debate on Patent Reform this week once the FAA Re-authorization Bill is settled. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:15 am
Microsoft’s brief, as well as several of the supporting amicus briefs, cite to In re Etter,756 F.2d 852 (Fed. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
., In re American Academy of Science Tech Center, 367 F.3d 1359, 1362-63 (Fed. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 11:34 am
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
Inter partes reexaminations provide a third party the right to participate in the reexamination process and, thus, have a res judicata effect on the third party requester in any subsequent or concurrent civil action. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
In re Yamamoto, 740 F.2d 1569, 222 USPQ 934 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
Patent Office following re-examinations that were launched by Fairchild. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 1:30 am
Nach einer Analyse der Besonderheiten der Rechtssprache werden zunächst die theoretischen Grundlagen untersucht und in der Folge interdisziplinäre Fragestellungen erörtert. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
lang? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
Several important BPAI decision relating to patent reissue, In re Tanaka, In re Staats, and In re Mostafazadeh are now on appeal to the CAFC. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:27 pm
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:02 am
In re Yamamoto, 740 F.2d 1569, 222 USPQ 934 (Fed. [read post]
