Search for: "Lawrence v. Lawrence" Results 781 - 800 of 4,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 12:57 pm by David Markus
As Verrilli began to discuss Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
" Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that "U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:38 am by David Snyder
’” The Commonwealth Court noted that the US Supreme Court in “Kelo v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
LaFleur (decided the year after Roe) and Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:07 am
Court rejects attorney’s claim that public funds were wasted because he was qualified and would have done the legal work for substantially less moneyMatter of Diederich v Lawrence, 2010 NY Slip Op 07850, Decided on November 4, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAttorney Michael Diederich Jr., a resident of Rockland County, sued the Rockland County Solid Waste Management Authority contending that Authority had “wasted taxpayer money” by paying a law firm,… [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 1:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Concerning the fellow-servant rule, the doctrine of vicarious liability and the doctrine of respondeat superior in New York StateBuckley v City Of New York, 56 N.Y.2d 300 [Decided with Lawrence v City of New York]These cases essentially involved the question of whether the fellow-servant rule continues to apply in New York. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
Other commentary focuses on Fisher v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Kelvin Lawrence
Posted by Kelvin LawrenceIn a 6-3 opinion penned by Justice Breyer, the United States Supreme Court ruled on June 4 that the City of Indianapolis did not violate the 14th Amendment's guarantee of Equal Protection by denying refunds to taxpayers who paid a special sewer assessment in a lump sum, while discharging the future obligations of taxpayers who would have paid the assessment by installments. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:16 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Weinstein for tipping me off to another hot-off-the-presses decision addressing class arbitration waivers following AT&T Mobility v. [read post]